<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: For Whom the Blog Tolls, Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ctsummationblog.wordpress.com/2008/01/25/for-whom-the-blog-tolls-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ctsummationblog.wordpress.com/2008/01/25/for-whom-the-blog-tolls-part-1/</link>
	<description>Surfing the Rising Tide of e-Discovery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 00:55:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ctsummationblog</title>
		<link>http://ctsummationblog.wordpress.com/2008/01/25/for-whom-the-blog-tolls-part-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>ctsummationblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctsummationblog.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great response.

Blogging has many issues to watch out for in litigation.  There are cases where a juror was challenged for having a blog during a trial, First Amendment issues with students using blogs to encourage on campus actions, and child custody fights where parents made conflicting statements in court and on their blogs.  

Blogging will continue to be an issue in litigation.  As for the future, I am very interested in policies regarding instant &amp; text messages that companies develop.  We have one upcoming article on that topic alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great response.</p>
<p>Blogging has many issues to watch out for in litigation.  There are cases where a juror was challenged for having a blog during a trial, First Amendment issues with students using blogs to encourage on campus actions, and child custody fights where parents made conflicting statements in court and on their blogs.  </p>
<p>Blogging will continue to be an issue in litigation.  As for the future, I am very interested in policies regarding instant &amp; text messages that companies develop.  We have one upcoming article on that topic alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simplicato</title>
		<link>http://ctsummationblog.wordpress.com/2008/01/25/for-whom-the-blog-tolls-part-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>simplicato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 06:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctsummationblog.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Hi -- Nice blog you have going here. Personally, I think FRCP eDiscovery court rules are highlighting what can best be described as a rapidly evolving corporate landscape. While email archiving and data retention have slowly gained attention as critical forms of legal insurance, it is not hard to see why blogging is close behind. What do you think will be the next electronic communication to be regulated? Message boards? Group discussions? Looking forward to part II.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8212; Nice blog you have going here. Personally, I think FRCP eDiscovery court rules are highlighting what can best be described as a rapidly evolving corporate landscape. While email archiving and data retention have slowly gained attention as critical forms of legal insurance, it is not hard to see why blogging is close behind. What do you think will be the next electronic communication to be regulated? Message boards? Group discussions? Looking forward to part II.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
